Investors
Deal flow arrives from people who have seen you be useful
Founders decide who to approach long before they raise, and they decide it from what they have seen someone say in public. That makes being consistently useful on social a deal flow activity rather than a marketing one, and it is usually the first thing a partner drops when a quarter gets busy.
Watch the founders, not the news
Watchlists track specific founders and operators so their posts reach you rather than being lost in a feed, and topic search surfaces the conversations in your thesis areas. What you get is a short list of places where saying something useful would be noticed.
A partner voice, not a fund voice
Each partner gets a persona built from their own writing, so the fund does not show up as one indistinguishable house style across several accounts. Founders can tell the difference, and it is the whole reason a personal account outperforms a fund account.
Nothing goes out unreviewed
By default nothing posts without approval on any plan. A public comment from an investor carries weight it does not carry from anyone else, so a draft that misses is one you change rather than one you have to walk back.
A record of who the fund has already engaged
Deduplication and a thirty day engagement cooldown are enforced across the whole workspace rather than per person, so two partners do not both turn up under the same founder post in the same week.
Common questions
- Can several partners use one workspace?
- On Team, yes: several seats and several connected accounts in one workspace, each with its own persona, sharing one suppression list so the fund does not contact the same founder twice.
- Is anything published without a partner seeing it?
- Not by default, on any plan or platform. The one exception is an optional autopilot for LinkedIn campaigns, which is Team only and off unless somebody switches it on for a specific campaign, and it is unavailable on X entirely.
- Does this work for finding companies as well as being visible?
- It surfaces founders talking about the problems in your thesis, scored against a profile you describe. What it does not do is act as a data provider: it works from public conversation rather than a company database.